Christopher asks a few questions about my previous post on the Open Source software that was included on the Macs. They’re great questions requiring longer answers, so I’ll address them here in a new post rather than in the comments.
“Are you also interested in free but not open source mac apps?“
Unless it can be run for any purpose, studied to see how it works, adapted to your needs, improved, changed and distributed with or without changes then I don’t consider it to be Free Software. Free Software is software that respects these essential user freedoms. If there is a Free Software option or an Open Source software option, I always choose to include it. Freeware, software that you don’t have to pay for but that is not Free, can also be useful but we should ask: why isn’t it Free? Richard Stallman has published a great essay on the implications of all this specific language, you can read it here.
“Can you give more information about why you chose the particular apps that you did?“
The applications that are included on my Mac image come from a few sources. Some are what I consider to be, based on my research and personal experience, the best in class for that function. In other cases, they came from user requests. Others are chosen because they provide the user with the most freedom. For example, applications like R and Latex were included in the image because they were requested by students who were using the Macs. OpenOffice (NeoOffice) and Firefox have grown in popularity not only because of the features they offer, but most importantly because of the freedoms they offer to users. Power and reliability are not my primary concern when it comes to including software on the image, instead I’m interested in software that does not restrict or control users. The Mac OS is chained down with enough restrictions on freedom, from the End User License Agreements to the DRM in the media. Including as much Free Software as possible on our Mac OS X computers is an act of resistance. It’s free software and it gives you freedom!
“Also I noticed you have a few browsers (Firefox, Camino, Shiira, presumably Safari), why so many?“
I can think of three reasons off the top of my head, there are probably others:
- A web site will appear differently in each of these browsers. It’s important when you create content online that you know what it will look like to users on different operating systems and with different browsers. After checking it on multiple Mac browsers, I suggest looking at it on a Windows PC, and for Windows users, the reverse is also suggested. A web designer should always think outside of their own screen. It’s amazing how often you’ll find a site that fits the designers screen size perfectly…but looks odd on every other computer.
- Distinct from the issue of appearance, many web sites are still being designed and tested with IE only and may work with one of the Mac OS X browsers but not the others. One example is the CUNY Portal, which works in Firefox but not in Safari.
- Freedom of choice. Some users may prefer to use one browser over another, and by providing them with all of the currently available options, I let them make that decision.
“Can NeoOffice deal with .docx files?“
NeoOffice has experimental support for opening and saving the .docx file format. However, Micro$oft offers a stand alone converter that can be used to change these to .doc files. I would suggest that all users create files in open, accessible formats that are readable by users on any operating system. A user shouldn’t have to own a particular piece of software in order to open your file.